Colour Blindness Simulator
Free colour blindness simulator, color blindness filter online and color vision deficiency simulator for designers and developers. Use as a color blind test image tool and accessible design checker. Upload any image and preview it through 8 types of colour vision deficiency - Protanopia, Deuteranopia, Tritanopia, Achromatopsia and more. Use the severity slider to simulate partial colour blindness at any level. Export all 8 simulations as a single comparison image. A protanopia deuteranopia tritanopia image simulator and colorblind friendly design checker, with client-side processing - your images never leave your browser.
Preview Any Image Through 8 Types of Colour Vision Deficiency
Rate this tool
Everything the Colour Blindness Simulator Does
How to Use the Colour Blindness Simulator
Colour Blindness Simulator: LazyTools vs Competitors
Most free online colour blindness simulators show only the most common 3-4 types without a severity slider. The severity slider - simulating partial CVD - is the key differentiator absent on free tools.
| Feature | LazyTools | color-blindness.com | pilestone.com | toptal.com/designers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVD types simulated | 8 types | 8 types | 4 types | 6 types |
| Severity / partial CVD slider | Yes (0-100%) | No | No | No |
| All views simultaneously | Yes (grid) | Yes | One at a time | One at a time |
| Export all views | Yes (one PNG) | No | No | No |
| Image stays in browser | Yes (100%) | Yes | Server upload | Yes |
| Research-based matrices | Machado 2009 | Yes | Approximate | Yes |
| No login required | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Types of Colour Vision Deficiency
Colour vision deficiency (CVD) affects the ability to distinguish certain colours. It is caused by the absence or malfunction of one or more types of cone cells in the retina. There are three types of cones, sensitive to long (L/red), medium (M/green), and short (S/blue) wavelengths of light.
| CVD Type | Affected cone | Prevalence (men) | What is confused |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protanopia | L (red) absent | ~1% | Red and green; red appears dark/black |
| Protanomaly | L (red) weak | ~1% | Red and green (milder); poor red sensitivity |
| Deuteranopia | M (green) absent | ~1% | Red and green; greens look washed out |
| Deuteranomaly | M (green) weak | ~5% | Red and green (milder); most common CVD |
| Tritanopia | S (blue) absent | <0.01% | Blue and green; yellow and red |
| Tritanomaly | S (blue) weak | <0.01% | Blue and green (milder) |
| Achromatopsia | All cones absent | <0.003% | All colour; sees only grey |
| Achromatomaly | All cones weak | Rare | Reduced colour discrimination overall |
How do colour blind people see my design?
The most common question designers ask is how colour blind people see their work. For red-green colour blindness (affecting roughly 8% of men), the primary issue is distinguishing red from green. Traffic lights, error and success states, data charts using red and green, and form validation feedback are all common problem areas. This colour blindness simulator for images online free shows exactly what your design looks like through each type of CVD, so you can identify and fix these issues before publishing.
Protanopia and deuteranopia simulator: the red-green gap
The protanopia and deuteranopia simulator views are the most important for most web designers. Together, protanopia and deuteranopia (and their milder variants) affect approximately 8% of men. Both conditions cause red-green confusion, but in different ways: protanopia results in reduced sensitivity to red wavelengths, making reds appear darker or even black. Deuteranopia affects green sensitivity, making greens look more greyish. Both conditions make it impossible to distinguish red from green at similar brightness levels.
Tritanopia simulator: the blue-yellow issue
The tritanopia simulator shows how people with blue-yellow colour blindness see your design. Tritanopia is much rarer than red-green CVD (affecting fewer than 1 in 10,000 people) but unlike red-green CVD, it affects men and women equally. People with tritanopia have difficulty distinguishing blue from green and yellow from red. Blue warning colours on yellow backgrounds and cyan-on-blue combinations are common problem areas.
Achromatopsia simulator: designing for complete colour blindness
The achromatopsia simulator (complete colour blindness) shows your design in pure greyscale. While achromatopsia is extremely rare (approximately 1 in 30,000), designing well for achromatopsia means designing well for all colour blind users: if your design is comprehensible in greyscale, all colour information has been supplemented with shape, pattern, label or position cues that work for everyone. The greyscale view is also useful for checking the luminance contrast of your design elements.
Web accessibility color test free: WCAG 1.4.1
WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 1.4.1 (Use of Colour, Level A) states that colour must not be the only visual means of conveying information, indicating an action, prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual element. This means form fields cannot show validation state through red/green colouring alone - they need an icon, text label or border style change in addition. Data charts cannot use only colour to distinguish data series - they need patterns, labels or shapes. This colour blindness simulator is a practical web accessibility color test free tool to identify these WCAG failures before they reach production.
CVD design review tool: practical recommendations
After running your design through this CVD design review tool, the standard fixes for colour blindness accessibility are: add icons or symbols alongside colour-coded states (a checkmark for success, an X for error); use patterns in addition to colours in charts and graphs; ensure sufficient luminance contrast between foreground and background elements (check with the WCAG Contrast Checker); avoid relying on red-green combinations for important state changes; and use colour-blind-safe palettes (such as the Okabe-Ito palette) for data visualisation.